Impacto de la pandemia por COVID-19 en los Servicios de Rehabilitación de España / Pandemic COVID-19 impact in Rehabilitation Services in Spain

Introducción: El presente estudio tiene como objetivo describir la adaptación de los servicios de Rehabilitación al rápido y significativo incremento de pacientes con COVID-19 con necesidad de valoración y tratamiento rehabilitador. Material y métodos: Estudio transversal. Se realizó una encuesta online entre los principales servicios de Rehabilitación de España entre el 22-12-2020 y el 27-02-2021. Un comité de expertos de SORECAR desarrolló la encuesta. El análisis se realizó utilizando SPSS v22.0. Objetivo: Definir las necesidades y los cambios surgidos a raíz de la pandemia SARS-CoV-2 en los servicios de Medicina Física y Rehabilitación (SMFyR). Resultados: Participaron 38 servicios de Rehabilitación de 18 ciudades (se enviaron encuestas a 49 centros hospitalarios). La demanda asistencial media en Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos fue de 7,84 ± 6,8 hojas de interconsulta (HIC)/semana, planta de hospitalización: 9,63 ± 6,21 HIC/semana de media. En horas de trabajo por semana, el tiempo médico dedicado fue 6,59 h/semana y el tiempo de fisioterapeutas fue de 16,43 h/semana. Ahora el tiempo medio de dedicación en médicos es 10,38 h/semana y en fisioterapeutas es de 25,95 h/semana. Solo 7 hospitales de la muestra (16,7%) cuentan con terapeutas ocupacionales con dedicación media de 5 h/semana.El 59,1% (n = 23) de los casos hay una consulta específica de Rehabilitación post-COVID. El 64,3% (n = 24) de los hospitales afirmaban haber desarrollado un protocolo específico asistencial en el servicio para pacientes COVID-19. Un 48,5% (n = 18) de centros no dispone de rotación específica en Rehabilitación en cuidados intensivos ni en rehabilitación respiratoria para los médicos internos residentes. Solo en rehabilitación respiratoria (15,7%, n = 6), en ambas disciplinas en un 38,4% (n = 14).(AU)

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic situation has brought a considerable growth on the amount of patients requiring ICU admissions and long-term hospitalization. The present study is aimed at determining whether Rehabilitation Services has been able to reach a sufficient adaptation level, regarding the exponential increase on the demand of Rehab-related services from intensive care patients and inpatients. Material and methods: Through this cross-sectional research, an online survey was implemented in various Rehabilitation Departments across Spain from December the 22nd, 2020 to February the 12th, 2021. SORECAR (The Spanish Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation Society) was the responsible entity for the design of the survey (ICU Rehabilitation Services Identification). Descriptive statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS. Objective: To address the specific needs and changes arising from the new COVID-19 pandemic situation within Spanish Rehabilitation Departments. Results: 38 hospitals from 18 cities (From a total of 49) participated in the study. The ICUs weekly demand scored 7.84 ± 6,8 Medical Consultation (MC) on average (range: 2-45). The hospitalization average was displayed as 9, 63 ± 6,2 MC/week (range: 2-55). The total worktime dedicated by physicians was 10.38 h/week, from which physiotherapists stood with 25.95 h/week. Only 7 hospitals (16.7%) counted with occupational therapists (OT) (average dedication of 5 h/week). Each Rehab-session lasted 30 min on average.(AU)

[Pandemic COVID-19 impact in Rehabilitation Services in Spain]. / Impacto de la pandemia por COVID-19 en los Servicios de Rehabilitación de España.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic situation has brought a considerable growth on the amount of patients requiring ICU admissions and long-term hospitalization. The present study is aimed at determining whether Rehabilitation Services has been able to reach a sufficient adaptation level, regarding the exponential increase on the demand of Rehab-related services from intensive care patients and inpatients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Through this cross-sectional research, an online survey was implemented in various Rehabilitation Departments across Spain from December the 22nd, 2020 to February the 12th, 2021. SORECAR (The Spanish Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation Society) was the responsible entity for the design of the survey (ICU Rehabilitation Services Identification). Descriptive statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS. OBJECTIVE: To address the specific needs and changes arising from the new COVID-19 pandemic situation within Spanish Rehabilitation Departments. RESULTS: 38 hospitals from 18 cities (From a total of 49) participated in the study. The ICUs weekly demand scored 7.84 ± 6,8 Medical Consultation (MC) on average (range: 2-45). The hospitalization average was displayed as 9, 63 ± 6,2 MC/week (range: 2-55). The total worktime dedicated by physicians was 10.38 h/week, from which physiotherapists stood with 25.95 h/week. Only 7 hospitals (16.7%) counted with occupational therapists (OT) (average dedication of 5 h/week). Each Rehab-session lasted 30 min on average. 59.1% (n = 23) of the included hospitals had already implemented a specific post-covid follow-up rehab-consultation, whereas 9.1% (n = 4) of them were planning on implementing it. 64.3% (n = 24) of the surveyed centers implemented specific protocols for COVID-19 patients, while another 7.1% (n = 3) were in development progress. 48.5% (n = 18) of the surveyed centers did not owe its own specific training program within its ICUs and respiratory rehab-areas for the internal medical residents. CONCLUSIONS: The pandemic situation has resulted in a substantial increase on the workload in the Spanish Rehabilitation Services. Most of the hospitals included in the present study had already implemented outpatient follow-up consultations. Rehabilitation in critical patients is an exponentially recurrent topic for this medical specialty that needs to be furtherly addressed in the nearby future.

Emergency General Surgery and COVID-19 Pandemic: Are There Any Changes? A Scoping Review.

Background and Objectives: The pandemic of SARS-CoV-19 has affected the overall spectrum of General Surgery, either in the case management part, or in the type of cases. The purpose of this review is to gather all the parameters affected and to compare these changes between the pandemic period and the corresponding time frame of the previous year. Materials and Methods: A review of literature in two electronic databases (PubMed and Scopus) was performed examining studies during the pre-pandemic (March to May 2019) and pandemic (March to May 2020) period about emergency surgeries. The differences in case presentation in emergency rooms, patient characteristics, length of hospitalization, type of surgery, complications and mortality rate were compared. Results: The comparison of the studies revealed significant results highlighting the differences between the two time periods for each parameter. There has been observed an overall decrease in the number of cases presented for emergency and urgent surgery. In terms of age, sex, and BMI, there were no significant variations amongst the patients. About the length of hospitalization, the patients hospitalized longer during the pandemic period. In terms of pathologies, the most common types of surgery were appendectomy, gastrointestinal, and colorectal resection. Mortality did not differ between the two study periods. Conclusions: COVID-19 affected a large part of Emergency General Surgery mainly concerns the type of operations performed. The hospitalization of patients, the complications that may have arisen and the recognition of emergencies were the most important issues faced by health care officials in hospitals during the period of COVID-19; however, there were parameters like mortality and patients' characteristics that did not appear to differ with pre-pandemic era.

Feasibility of Conducting a Virtual Exit Exam in Neurosurgery During the SARS-COV19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Skills assessment forms an integral part of the exit examination in neurosurgical training programs. The established method of evaluating trainees for their clinical knowledge and surgical proficiency in the operating room is not feasible in the current time of SARS-COV19 pandemic. OBJECTIVE: The feasibility of conducting such an assessment using case modules on an online meeting platform is discussed. METHODS: Six candidates were evaluated on two consecutive days with two internal examiners located at the examination site and two external examiners situated at their own institutions elsewhere in the country. Clinical details, including images and videos of patients managed at our institute were recorded and provided to the candidates as case modules. Four sessions were conducted in the form of long and short cases, operative neurosurgery, neuroradiology, and neuropathology and a general viva-voce using "Zoom" (Zoom-Video-Communications, Inc. USA) platform. Feedback from the examinee and the examiners were obtained for any modification in the current format. RESULT: The online platform worked well without any interruption except for slight lag in the audio-visual system and occasional difficulty in using microphone and screen simultaneously. Trainees were able to interpret the clinical details and rated this format close to actual clinical evaluation. The examiners uniformly agreed that the online format for assessment was satisfactory and made some suggestions for improvement. CONCLUSION: Clinical and surgical skill evaluation is feasible using case modules and online meeting platforms. Use of original patient's data, images, videos demonstrating clinical signs, and operative procedures makes this assessment more objective.